Linguistic Relativity — What Language Shapes and What It Doesn't
An examination of whether language shapes thought, from Sapir and Whorf to modern experimental evidence.
Category
6articles followthis line of inquiry.
An examination of whether language shapes thought, from Sapir and Whorf to modern experimental evidence.
Three research traditions use "epistemic trust" to mean three different things. Searching for the literature reveals how terminology can mask conceptual fragmentation.
Garden-path sentences trick readers into committing to a wrong interpretation. Studying them reveals how language processing works in real time.
Precision is often treated as a virtue. In law, natural language, and design, ambiguity is not a flaw — it is a deliberate feature that makes systems adaptable over time.
The signal-to-noise ratio is a precise engineering metric that became a loose metaphor across domains. Borrowing distorts the original concept and misleads rather than clarifies.
Text must be broken into pieces before any language model processes it. Tokenization decides what those pieces are, and the choice shapes everything the model can express.